mccoy will build on a solid season last year, stover will be electrifying if he can stay healthy (remember the Colorado game?), but the one no one has said is: Nick Walker. look for a lot of bootlegs with the option for JP to go to Walker in the flat. that goes for Terry Grant as well. _________________ Rammer Jammer
Yellow Hammer
Give 'em hell
Alabama!!
Age: 36 Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Posts: 1490 Location: Hugufairfshamuanett
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:38 am Post subject:
firestorm wrote:
Just guessing but... What about the TE corp factor in new McElwain's offense?
RTR,
Are TE considered receivers? lol You would not know it from our last 6-7 years of offense _________________ There will always be hope, wherever you are. Until you abandon it.
"I have been thinking with my gut since I was 14. I just now realize, that my guts have s*** for brains."
Age: 36 Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Posts: 1490 Location: Hugufairfshamuanett
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:39 am Post subject:
mattjaeger wrote:
whoever is open...duh!
mccoy will build on a solid season last year, stover will be electrifying if he can stay healthy (remember the Colorado game?), but the one no one has said is: Nick Walker. look for a lot of bootlegs with the option for JP to go to Walker in the flat. that goes for Terry Grant as well.
I like Walker but he has butter hands a lot.... _________________ There will always be hope, wherever you are. Until you abandon it.
"I have been thinking with my gut since I was 14. I just now realize, that my guts have s*** for brains."
Provided the OL improves, JPW will be afforded the opportunity to check-down further through his progressions when needed...spreading out the receptions.
Provided the OL improves, the TE will emerge more as a receiving threat...as will the RBs.
All this said, I am hoping that break-out pass catcher this year will be the TE. However the breakout Receiver this year I suspect will be McCoy, but I suspect his numbers will not be significantly different than the next best.
Age: 24 Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 606 Location: Spain
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 7:00 am Post subject:
Kc wrote:
Are TE considered receivers? lol You would not know it from our last 6-7 years of offense
Hey buddy, I do know our offense didn't look the tight end corp as a receiver threat in last years... but now, with McElwain running our offense, seems that factor could be exploited often. Times are changing.
RTR, _________________ "I want every team we play against to say, I hate playing against these guys" Nick Saban
I voted other...although a single back might not be the leading guy, I think collectively they may be #1 in total yards and receptions. _________________ '89 Grad in North Carolina
Age: 36 Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Posts: 1490 Location: Hugufairfshamuanett
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:40 pm Post subject:
firestorm wrote:
Kc wrote:
Are TE considered receivers? lol You would not know it from our last 6-7 years of offense
Hey buddy, I do know our offense didn't look the tight end corp as a receiver threat in last years... but now, with McElwain running our offense, seems that factor could be exploited often. Times are changing.
RTR,
Hey Buddy?
Notice I didn't take a jab at the future...friend. _________________ There will always be hope, wherever you are. Until you abandon it.
"I have been thinking with my gut since I was 14. I just now realize, that my guts have s*** for brains."
Last edited by Kc on Sun May 11, 2008 8:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
Age: 36 Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Posts: 1490 Location: Hugufairfshamuanett
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:44 pm Post subject:
TerryP wrote:
Walker was our 4th leading receiver last year.
Hall had 67.
Caddell 40.
McCoy 28.
Walker 23.
What ya want to bet Walker has more than that halfway through the season?
I am hoping it will be spread around and all our TE's WR's are involved. That would be a good thing. Someone will come out as the go to guy. _________________ There will always be hope, wherever you are. Until you abandon it.
"I have been thinking with my gut since I was 14. I just now realize, that my guts have s*** for brains."
Age: 21 Joined: 09 Aug 2006 Posts: 9754 Location: The party
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 9:02 pm Post subject:
Kc wrote:
firestorm wrote:
Kc wrote:
Are TE considered receivers? lol You would not know it from our last 6-7 years of offense
Hey buddy, I do know our offense didn't look the tight end corp as a receiver threat in last years... but now, with McElwain running our offense, seems that factor could be exploited often. Times are changing.
RTR,
Hey Buddy?
Notice I didn't take a jab at the future...friend.
Age: 36 Joined: 25 Jun 2006 Posts: 1490 Location: Hugufairfshamuanett
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:03 am Post subject:
Tider27 wrote:
Kc wrote:
firestorm wrote:
Kc wrote:
Are TE considered receivers? lol You would not know it from our last 6-7 years of offense
Hey buddy, I do know our offense didn't look the tight end corp as a receiver threat in last years... but now, with McElwain running our offense, seems that factor could be exploited often. Times are changing.
RTR,
Hey Buddy?
Notice I didn't take a jab at the future...friend.
Funny you got that Chris. I was actually thinking about that episode _________________ There will always be hope, wherever you are. Until you abandon it.
"I have been thinking with my gut since I was 14. I just now realize, that my guts have s*** for brains."
Last edited by Kc on Mon May 12, 2008 5:24 am; edited 1 time in total
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
